Internal Arts Guild masthead


"The Iron Hand In The Velvet Glove"


Anthony R. Walmsley. Copyright September 1998.
First published in "Tai Chi International" October 1998,UK.



People are drawn to Tai Chi Chuan for a number of reasons; the beauty of the forms, fascination with the philosophy, the well documented health benefits, "low impact" exercise or simply as an enjoyable social event twice a week.

Although everybody involved in Tai Chi practice is (or should be) aware of its martial origins, this side of the art receives the least attention in the majority of schools. I refer here to the Yang style in particular. It's interesting to note that the very people who would gain the most from this training (women, the physically small or weak, anybody shy or timid by nature, the over thirty five to forty age group or anyone who has never practiced, or isn't interested in, sports) are the first to raise their eyebrows at even the mention of something they perceive as much too rough or strenuous, rather vulgar, difficult, threatening, dangerous, unnecessary or only for the younger crowd, "I'm much too old for that sort of thing". I must admit that when I signed on for my first Yang style course at the age of forty three with no martial background and a general disinterest in anything even vaguely athletic, I too held pretty much the same opinions, in fact, for the first couple of years I wasn't trained in methods which to my mind had a direct connection with "martial arts" at all. I studied the Yang Cheng Fu long form, practiced standing Chi Kung and a bit of "Push Hands". I followed this program religiously and constantly reviewed what I was learning in my spare time.

During the first twelve months I managed to get over the "burning legs" syndrome, my balance and co-ordination improved and for the first time in my life, eliminated chronic backache and recurring knee problems. Much to my chagrin, this period came to an abrupt end when my first teacher was no longer available. Not wanting to lose ground, so to speak, I had no alternative but to look round for another school. This was easier said than done when I was living in southern Italy some fifteen years ago, not exactly the hub of the Tai Chi world! Not to be dismayed, I continued my training at home and began doing a bit of research.

Slowly, I came to the following startling conclusion, i.e., the introductions to the books I managed to get my hands on, were at odds with the training methods that followed! I must have ordered twenty or so books on Tai Chi, mainly from the USA and no matter what the ethnic origin of the authors, the net result was the same in that the introduction to each and every book was spiced with seemingly outrageous (and in many cases, disconcerting) anecdotes of the martial capacity of the founder of the Yang style, Yang Lu Chan and his sons Ban Hou and Chien Hou, whilst the rest of the book didn't seem to have much in common with the legend of the "Invincible Yangs"! Not knowing anything about martial arts or having the faintest idea what I was looking for, I assumed that the "Chuan" was only taught in certain schools; so, I did the rounds and spent a fortune on phonecalls only to find that the clubs I visited and contacted were projections of my growing book collection! Although the air was thick with well worn sayings, "internal energy", "Chi power", "soft martial art" etc, nobody I came across could demonstrate any of them (at least to my satisfaction), nobody taught Tai Chi for self defense and some instructors went so far as to say that it wasn't a martial art even when I insisted on showing them the introduction to "Yang Style Tai Ji Quan" by Yang Zhen Duo (Hai Feng Pub.Co. Hong Kong and Morning Glory Press, Beijing).

Here are a couple of quotes about Yang Cheng Fu taken from the introduction by Gu Liu Xin. "When he gave Tai Ji Quan exhibitions at the Zhirou Wushu Association during his early days in Shanghai, he performed the movements of kicking with speed and force", and, "though his punches were delivered in a gentle manner they were hard as a steel bar wrapped in soft cloth" but the stories about his older brother, Yang Shao Hou, are even more intriguing. "With lively footwork and well knit small movements, alternating quick with slow actions…"
This is a brief description of a way of performing the Yang style form that nobody seemed to know about and I couldn't find one teacher who even recognized the following as having anything to do with Tai Chi. "He (Shao Hou) was swift and powerful in delivering his blows and, with eyes blazing like torches, a grim smile on his face and roaring and howling as he darted back and forth, he was held in awe by others" Well, I'm not surprised!

But the best has yet to come...

"The technical features of this kind of Tai Ji were: overcoming strong attacks with soft movements, adapting oneself to others movements and following up with quick attacks, using the motion of "sudden connection" to defeat the opponent with surprise attacks. The hand movements included; catching, pushing and capturing, injuring the attackers' muscles and harming his bones, attacking the opponents vital points and controlling his arteries and veins, using "continuous" and "sudden connection" force to throw the attacker to the ground with lightning speed". Now, that sounded like a martial art to me! However, none of the "Tai Chi Players" I met had been even remotely trained as follows "When teaching his pupils Yang Shao Hou would attack them without pulling his punches. His attacking movements were swift and ferocious and his facial expression was changeable and varied". I was puzzled and frustrated that I couldn't find any information on Shao Hou. There were reams of material on Cheng Fu and if "…the two brothers enjoyed an equally high reputation during their lifetime…", why was nobody teaching what Shao Hou had taught?

It would have been acceptable if these methods had been lost or misinterpreted sometime way back when but we're talking about the 1920's and 30's. With my appetite suitably whetted, I continued my search and after almost a year found a newly opened school. "What d'you teach?" I asked the instructor over the phone. "The Yang style transmission of Yang Shao Hou", he said, " Classes begin next Tuesday". Before going any further, I should, perhaps, make a few things clear. I am in no way suggesting that this training is "a must for everybody" nor am I saying that it's the only way of doing things. As I observed at the beginning of this article, people come to Tai Chi for very different reasons and instructors teach Tai Chi for very different reasons. "Each to his own and respect for all". So, instead of comparing the pros and cons of one approach with any other, I'll just give a brief run-down of how I was taught and let the reader draw his or her own conclusions.

There were three, hour and a half lessons per week, Tuesday and Thursday evenings classes being loosely divided as follows. Ten to twenty minutes of stretching exercises or Pa Tuan Chin (the eight pieces of brocade) or Chan Chuang (embracing the tree) standing Chi Kung, followed by thirty to forty minutes of form practice and revision. The remaining times was devoted to combat training which I'll describe in a moment, first, the form, known as the "Old" Yang style. This contains all the recognizable characteristic moves and positions to be found in all versions of the Yang style, however, there are radical differences. Speed for speed, it takes much longer to complete than any other long form I'm aware of and is much more complicated and physically demanding, having for e.g. a leaping double kick and a greater number of low squatting positions. You'll excuse my terrible pun but the most striking difference is the use of Fa Jing (explosive energy expression), which punctuates the form at strategic points throughout. Due to space limitations, it's not possible or feasible here to describe all and everything that was taught, or in detail, however, I'll try to give an overall picture of combat training methods which, right from the first lesson, were practiced parallel to form training. These, once learned, were constantly reviewed and the more advanced students then taught them to the beginners. We were introduced to: "Push Hands", which was practiced very close to the partner in a normal standing position using rotational waist power with virtually no backwards or forwards movement whatsoever.

All attacks and counters were realistic; there was little or no "pushing" or "pulling". "Push Feet", to train kicking techniques and defense against them. This exercise also builds stamina, as being practiced on one leg, can be very tiring. "Sticking Hands", again with realistic attacks. The more advanced method has both partners on the move and anything goes including kicks and take-downs. We practiced all types of striking techniques with all parts of the body on hand mitts, the sack and each other and considerable time was spent on falling, rolling and break falling methods which were then applied during "Chin Na" (seizing and controlling) practice and form applications. "Shao San Shou (or Sao)", a two person combat form teaching economy of movement, body angling for maximum power with minimum effort, rooting, footwork, entering and self defense applications. "Long Hsia (or Har) Chuan", (dragon prawn, or lobster, boxing). This is a method of training Yang style self defense strategy and not, as the name may suggest, a style or school of Kung Fu. "She Fa", a short partner set training the "folding principle". "Eagle Vision", or the use of wide-angle peripheral perception to speed up responses and train sub-conscious reflex actions. (For a detailed explanation see the May '98 issue of T.C.I.)

We were taught massage, meditation, advanced breathing techniques, various Chi Kungs and Chi visualization methods. This program was further supplemented with a fighting applications class on Saturday afternoons where a move, or series of moves, was taken from the form, analyzed at various martial levels, then practiced over and over again with a partner. At least once a month we had a Sunday get together and learned Ba Gua Zhang Chi Kung (stationary and moving), several eight-palm-change forms, circle walking, body conditioning, partner sets and got to workout with the Tang Lang (mantis boxing) students. We were expected to do our homework on Taoist Philosophy in general (the Tai Chi Symbol, the Five Elements, the pre and post heaven trigram arrangements) and had to swot up on Traditional Chinese Medicine; not that we were aiming to become acupuncturists but a minimum of working knowledge was obligatory to the introductory study of Dian Xue (better known as Dim Mak), a subject so vast, complicated and far reaching in its' implications that more than a mention here would be futile. In closing, I must stress that though the training was (and still is) tough going and taken very seriously, it was conducted in an enjoyable, relaxed and easygoing atmosphere. There were no "contests", or "sparring" of any kind and even if the "attack-defense" methods solicited the occasional bruise, nobody was hurt or injured, nor was any student cajoled or pushed into doing something they weren't comfortable with or that was beyond their capabilities. The onus was on collaboration, not competition. If I managed it and I'm no spring chicken, I reckon almost anybody can give it a try. I can assure you that it's not necessary to be an Olympic athlete or a genius before attempting this material, plus, it's great fun and opens up totally unexpected horizons in the ongoing study of this most sophisticated of arts.


[ about us ] [ taiji ] [ qigong ] [ wtba ] [ faq ] [ links ] [ gallery ] [ home ][ articles ]

Created and maintained by steve@internalarts.co.uk
Copyright © 2000 Internal Arts Guild